Pop option for National France.Ĭlick to expand.There is more to National Populism than simply being reactionary and anti-parliamentarian, Paternal Autocrats have both of those qualities as well - they are, after all, autocratic. Pop leaders.įor all of the above, I definitely feel there should be a Nat. Now, he probably is more at home being a Paternal Autocrat but given the crow that gathered around him at Vichy, you could argue he should also have contact with potential Nat.

Everyone knows he led the Vichy Government OTL. Pop.Īnd finally there is the case of Pétain being in charge at the beginning in 1936. Pop and not Paternal Autocrat: Maurras' rhetoric is heavily reactionnary and anti-parliamentarian and some of ideas are close to Integralism which has been classified as Nat. And the main Monarchist group was Charles Maurras' Action Française which I have always felt should be Nat. But where this makes also no sense is with the Third Restoration: Monarchism at this point in time was heavily linked with Reactionnary and Anti-Parliamentarian thought in France. Still, there probably would be hardliners in there who would inisist on rebuilding the nation around its Emperor, which could have Nat. Pop path because historically Bonapartism was about conserving ideals of the French Revolution but under a more authoritarian form of government.

The Third Empire probably wouldn't necessarilly be a Nat. The third thing is that National France has in its focus tree options to abolish the Republic and become either the Third Empire or undergo the Third Restoration.

Kaiserreich dominion of india